Prepare the review
Pull together construction, imagery, permits, valuation context, fire response, Protection context, and nearby exposures.
For property inspection teams
Compare submitted values with available records, imagery, permits, valuation context, Protection context, and nearby exposures before completing the desk-review portion of QA.
Use available evidence to support QA. It does not replace field observations. A work email unlocks the full free report.
Illustrative fictional workflow example. Actual fields and availability vary by property and source.
PerilScore consolidates desk research around the property so inspection teams can spend less time switching source sites and more time reviewing differences that matter.
Pull together construction, imagery, permits, valuation context, fire response, Protection context, and nearby exposures.
Place provided values beside available records and context to identify fields that need confirmation.
Use consistent reports and transparent factors to support repeatable QA across properties and portfolios.
Swivel-chair review
PerilScore review
Use it to identify fields worth confirming: year built, construction, roof, area, nearby exposures, permits, and valuation context.
PerilScore organizes available evidence. Inspection teams still confirm conditions, occupancy, hazards, and discrepancies.
Compare the submitted record against available context before deciding what needs confirmation.
Compare product details, source context, and limitations with an AI assistant.